A Two-Phase Anomaly Detection Model for Secure Intelligent Transportation Ride-Hailing Trajectories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the taxi fraud problem and introduces a new solution to identify trajectory outliers. The approach as presented allows to identify both individual and group outliers and is based on a two phase-based algorithm. The first phase determines the individual trajectory outliers by computing the distance of each point in each trajectory, whereas the second identifies the group trajectory outliers by exploring the individual trajectory outliers using both feature selection and sliding windows strategies. A parallel version of the algorithm is also proposed using a sliding window-based GPU approach to boost the runtime performance. Extensive experiments have been carried out to thoroughly demonstrate the usefulness of our methodology on both synthetic and real trajectory databases. The results show that the GPU approach enables reaching a speed-up of 341 over the sequential algorithm on large synthetic databases. The efficiency of the proposed method to detect both individual and group trajectory outliers on a real-world taxi trajectory database is also demonstrated in comparison with baseline trajectory outlier and group detection algorithms. The results are very promising and show superiority of the proposed method both in reducing computational time and enhancing the quality of returned outliers. Finally, we prime our methodology and results for future refinement using deep learning methodologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".