MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089048514 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1900057

Experimental study of the differentiation of gabbro-syenite melt under superliquidus conditions

2020· article· en· W3089048514 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
N. I. Bezmen, P. N. Gorbachev, Reimar Seltmann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGabbroGeologyCrystallizationMagmaMagma chamberMineralogyAnorthositeGeochemistryRheologyIgneous rockMaterials scienceThermodynamicsComposite materialPlagioclase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In this work we present the results of experimental interaction of gabbro-syenite melt, corresponding to the average composition of Northern Timan rocks, with a complex hydrogen-containing fluid. The composition of the magmatic fluid was controlled to be close to natural conditions using a special cell in a high gas-pressure vessel. Under superliquidus conditions, the initial melt exsolves into melts of different composition, forming contrast, cryptic, and rhythmic melt stratifications. The experimental results agree with natural data in the petrochemical diagram. It follows from our experimental data that fluid-saturated melts in magmatic chambers are completely differentiated in the liquid state. In the absence of temperature gradients in the magma, gravitational migration of nanoclusters of different densities forms flotation, sedimentation, and rhythmic types of melt stratification. Transmission electron microscopy of the glasses formed in the cell was used to study the formation of nanoclusters in a fluid-saturated superliquidus anorthosite-granite model melt. Clusters with a size of 6 nm consist of a pseudo-crystalline anorthite core surrounded by fluid-saturated shells of the melt. The migration of fluid and fluid-enriched clusters to the upper part of the magmatic chamber results in the activation, from bottom to top, of the processes of crystallization in the magma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207