MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089090724 · doi:10.3749/canmin.2000026

Müllerite, the Fe-analogue of backite from Otto Mountain, California, USA

2020· article· en· W3089090724 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stuart J. Mills, Anthony R. Kampf, Koichi Momma, R. M. Housley, J. Marty

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleochroismCrystallographyHexagonal crystal systemMohs scale of mineral hardnessTrigonal crystal systemCrystal structureCleavage (geology)Rietveld refinementMineralogyFormula unitChemistryMaterials scienceGeologyComposite materialFracture (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Müllerite (IMA2019–060) is a new mineral found at several workings on Otto Mountain, 2.5 km NW of Baker, San Bernardino County, California, USA. Müllerite occurs as hexagonal tablets and thin plates up to 0.2 mm across, intergrown ball-like clusters, and scattered flakes. Crystals are yellow, tending to reddish-orange, and have a pale-yellow streak and subadamantine to greasy luster. Crystals are brittle with an irregular fracture and have a hardness of ∼2 and perfect cleavage on {001}. The main forms observed are {100} and {001}. The calculated density is 5.812 g/cm3. The empirical formula (based on 7 O + Cl + I apfu) is Pb1.83Ag0.26Fe0.93Al0.03Cu0.02Te6+0.95O5.56Cl1.30I0.14; the endmember formula is Pb2Fe3+(Te6+O6)Cl. Müllerite is trigonal, space group P312, with the unit cell parameters a = 5.2040(5), c = 8.9654(12) Å, V = 210.23(3) Å3, and Z = 1. The crystal structure of müllerite was refined using Rietveld analysis and converged to Rwp = 4.861%, S = 0.1873, RB = 1.800%, and RF = 0.691%. Müllerite is the Fe-analogue of backite, Pb2Al3+(Te6+O6)Cl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207