MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089095785 · doi:10.4000/communication.7861

Philip N. HOWARD et Muzammil M. HUSSAIN (2013), Democracy’s Fourth Wave? Digital Media and the Arab Spring / Mohamed ZAYANI (2015), Networked Publics and Digital Contention: The Politics of Everyday Life in Tunisia

2018· article· en· W3089095785 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tristan Mattelart

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpring (device)DemocracyPolitical scienceHumanitiesArtMedia studiesSociologyLawPhysicsPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les deux ouvrages considérés, celui de Philip N. Howard et Muzammil M. Hussain et celui de Mohamed Zayani, portent sur le même thème — celui du rôle des technologies d’information et de communication dans ledit printemps arabe —, ils ont été publiés chez le même éditeur et dans la même collection — celle dirigée par Andrew Chadwick, « Oxford Studies in Digital Politics » —, mais ils offrent sur leur sujet des perspectives radicalement différentes. Le premier livre se situe dans la continuité ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207