MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089102928 · doi:10.4236/ajibm.2020.109102

The Comparison Analysis of China and Foreign Countries to Deal with the Economic Risk by Epidemic, in Terms of Monetary and Fiscal Policy

2020· article· en· W3089102928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhenchuan Jiang, Xuanxuan Wang, Huanlan Wang, Lu Guo, Guohong Wang, Xun Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Industrial and Business Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaDeveloping countryDeveloped countryPoliticsEconomicsFiscal policyEconomic policyMonetary policyDevelopment economicsBusinessEconomic growthPolitical scienceMacroeconomicsMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This year, the most attractive current politics and economy news is the measures taken by governments to deal with the risk caused by the epidemic. It is widely believed that the global economy has suffered seriously from the virus. To deal with that, developed countries such as the US, Canada, Japan, the EU, the developing countries, like China, Brazil has already announced some measures and policy. As a big developing country, China is worthy to be analyzed, compared with different period of itself and other countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Industrial and Business ManagementSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207