MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089106347 · doi:10.15353/cjo.v82i3.1934

Utilisation de prismes jumelés et de prismes différentiels pour améliorer la posture

2020· article· fr· W3089106347 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jonathon Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGynecologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente des cas de changements posturaux et l’utilisation de prismes pour soulager les symptômes causés par les syndromes A et V (avec une suggestion quant à leur cause) ; l’asymétrie de la position de l’apophyse mastoïde ; l’asymétrie faciale résultant d’un taux de croissance inégal du crâne ; le relâchement de la mâchoire ; le syndrome de Duane et la paralysie du 6e nerf, ainsi que le dos voûté chez les patients âgés. Bien que les prismes jumelés et différentiels soient utilisés pour traiter et atténuer les symp-tômes éprouvés par les patients qui ont subi un traumatisme craniocéré-bral léger (TCCL), cela dépasse la portée du présent article. Les méthodes d’examen des patients et les prismes prescrits sont décrits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207