MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089195512

The “New Fallen Woman” in George Gissing’s The Odd Women

2020· article· en· W3089195512 on OpenAlexaff
Alora Hayward

Bibliographic record

VenueCrossings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)Interpretation (philosophy)New WomanCriticismSociologyGender studiesVictorian eraSocial criticismHistoryArt historyLiteratureArtPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this essay I present the new concept of “The New Fallen Woman,” which merges the Victorian notions of “The New Woman” and “The Fallen Woman”. I analyze Rhoda Nunn and Monica Widdowson, characters in George Gissing’s’ The Odd Women, and especially focus on various examples of their supposed “New Woman” and “Fallen Woman” sides. By examining Nunn and Widdowson, my essay questions the validity of these Victorian Era social categories. “The New Fallen Woman,” my interpretation of the way these characters are represented, is a new and productive way of understanding how Gissing represents women in The Odd Women. “The New Fallen Woman,” I suggest, helps to promote the idea that there is a positivity found within categories which can otherwise, especially in contemporary Victorian criticism, be deemed negative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrossingsSame topicModernist Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207