MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089226957 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000198

Inline Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Valves: The Essential Component of Individualized Split Ventilator Circuits

2020· article· en· W3089226957 on OpenAlex
Steven Roy, Leonard Bunting, Stefan Ståhl, Dominik Textor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPositive end-expiratory pressureMedicineMechanical ventilatorEconomic shortagePositive pressureIntensive care medicineInternal medicineMechanical ventilationAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: As resources are overwhelmed with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, multiple approaches to produce individualized split-ventilator designs have emerged. These designs attempt to address the significant limitations and safety concerns of coventilation practices by allowing practitioners to adjust pressure settings for individual patients connected with specialized circuits to a single ventilator. The critical component in virtually all individualized circuit designs is the adjustable inline positive end-expiratory pressure valve. Methods: We reviewed the literature on the mechanics of inline positive end-expiratory pressure valve function, the implications and considerations for advanced application of inline positive end-expiratory pressure valves in individualized circuits, available methods of adapting commercial positive end-expiratory pressure valves in the resource-restricted setting, and major caveats of the use of inline positive end-expiratory pressure valves. Results and Conclusions: The function of adjustable inline positive end-expiratory pressure valves in advanced individualized ventilator circuits has not been described. Adjustable inline positive end-expiratory pressure valves are critical to individualized circuit reliability and patient safety when attempting to extend ventilator capacity in the setting of extreme ventilator shortages. Adjustable inline positive end-expiratory pressure valves provide a means to reduce delivered peak inspiratory pressure to an individual patient circuit, a method to increase positive end-expiratory pressure for an individual patient circuit, and act as an one-way valve to ensure unidirectional gas flow through the divided circuit. Adjustable inline positive end-expiratory pressure valves can be adapted from commercial valves or printed de novo when commercial options are unavailable. Noncommercial sourcing of ventilator components should only be considered in the setting of extreme ventilator shortages under the supervision of a knowledgeable anesthesiologist or intensivist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it