MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089241591 · doi:10.1002/bdr2.1808

Physical activity and gestational weight gain predict physiological and perceptual responses to exercise during pregnancy

2020· article· en· W3089241591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBirth Defects Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPregnancyMedicineGestationBody mass indexWeight gainGestational ageObstetricsInternal medicineBody weight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Exercise is known to improve the health of the pregnant woman and her child. Studies that have evaluated physiological parameters during prenatal exercise have conflicting results. Better understanding of these physiological responses can modify exercise prescriptions, safety, and monitoring strategies. We examined the association between age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational weight gain (GWG), and physical activity (PA) levels, factors that may influence a change in physiological (HR, VO 2 responses) and perceptual (RPE) responses to acute exercise throughout pregnancy. Methods Twenty‐two healthy pregnant women (31.4 ± 3.7 years) performed a Submaximal incremental Walking Exercise Test (SWET). Early‐ (13–18 weeks), mid‐ (24–28 weeks), and late‐pregnancy (34–37 weeks) were compared. VO 2 (L/min; ml/kg/min), HR (bpm), and RPE were collected at the end of each test stage. PA was determined by accelerometry. We associated PA levels, GWG, prepregnancy BMI, and age with HR, RPE, and VO 2 responses. Results HR, RPE, and absolute VO 2 were higher in late‐pregnancy compared to earlier time points ( p < .05; η 2 = 0.299–0.525). Regression models were built for HR (all time points), RPE (early‐ and late‐pregnancy), and VO 2 (L/min; late‐pregnancy). HR (late‐pregnancy) was predicted by time in vigorous PA, GWG, age, and prepregnancy BMI ( r 2 = 0.645; SEE = 5.84). RPE (late‐pregnancy) was predicted by sedentary time, GWG, prepregnancy BMI, and age ( r 2 = 0.662; SEE = 1.21). Conclusion Physiological/perceptual responses were higher in late‐pregnancy compared to other time points and associated with combined PA, GWG, prepregnancy BMI, and age. These findings can be used to modify exercise prescriptions and designs for future PA interventions in pregnant women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it