Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo traza la relación entre un historiador de la filosofía y el círculo intelectual de la Kulturwissenschafltliche Bibliothek Warburg a través de un grupo de documentos archivísticos que han aparecido recientemente. Empapado del mundo multidisciplinario y colectivo de la biblioteca de Aby Warburg en Hamburgo, Raymond Klibansky maduró junto con la propia biblioteca, participando y dirigiendo una serie de proyectos central a la identidad del Warburg Institute, tal como renació en Inglaterra en la década de 1930, como por ejemplo la edición del Corpus Platonicum Medii Aevi en latín y arabe, y el famoso Saturn and Melancholy co-escrito con Erwin Panofsky and Fritz Saxl. Esta breve mirada ilustra la persistencia del enfoque en el pluralismo y la transmisión entendida como Nachleben en el corazón del empeño humanista, y esboza el alcance de la obra de este erudito, para quien el método warburgiano fue clave en su desarrollo y en su activismo a lo largo del siglo XX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it