The Development of Sociocultural Component in Professional Education of Future Navigators in the Fifties of the XXth Century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to developing the socio-cultural component in professional education of future navigators in the 50s of the XXth century. Considered resolutions of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) and the Central Committee of the CPSU, which influenced the teaching of disciplines that represent the socio-cultural component. Determined that during this period the leadership of party bodies was strengthened by scientific institutions of the republic, topics of friendship with people, Soviet patriotism, history of development of sociopolitical, philosophical and economic thought in Ukraine were obligatory for studying in higher and secondary special educational institutions. Described Russian socio-political thought and culture for the development of Ukrainian culture. It is concluded that since the educational institutions for training future navigators were subject to the regulations of the education sphere, and the development of the socio-cultural component of education is characterized by excessive politicization and ideology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it