Mapping Isoform Abundance and Interactome of the Endogenous TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Protein with Orthogonal Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry Assays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion, a molecular alteration driving nearly a half of prostate cancer cases, has been intensively characterized at the transcript level, while limited studies explored the molecular identity and function of the endogenous fusion at the protein level. Here, we developed and applied immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) assays for the measurement of a low-abundance T1E4 TMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein, its isoforms and its interactome in VCaP prostate cancer cells. IP-MS assays quantified total ERG (∼27,000 copies/cell) and its four unique isoforms, and revealed that the T1E4-ERG isoform accounts for 71% of the total ERG protein in VCaP cells. For the first time, the N-terminal peptide (methionine-truncated and N-acetylated TASSSSDYGQTSK) unique for the T1/E4 fusion was identified and quantified. IP-MS with the C-terminal antibodies identified 29 proteins in the ERG interactome, including SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex subunits and numerous transcriptional co-regulators. Our data also suggested that TMPRSS2-ERG protein-protein interactions were exerted through at least two different regions. Knowledge on the distinct TMPRSS2-ERG protein isoforms and interactomes may facilitate development of more accurate diagnostics and targeted therapeutics of prostate cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".