MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089368604 · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2020.09.008

Designer endosymbionts: Converting free-living bacteria into organelles

2020· article· en· W3089368604 on OpenAlex
Rebecca S. Meaney, Samir Hamadache, Maximillian P. M. Soltysiak, Bogumil J. Karas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Systems Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersWestern University
KeywordsEndosymbiosisOrganelleBiologyEukaryotic cellEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyChloroplastCell biologyPlastidGeneticsCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An emerging frontier in synthetic biology involves the engineering of interspecies relationships, one of which could result in the development of novel organelles. The endosymbiotic theory is the most widely accepted model for the evolutionary origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts, asserting that these organelles descended from free-living bacteria. Imitating this process experimentally, which we refer to herein as directed endosymbiosis, could enable the development of an entirely new class of organisms with synthetic organelles. In this review, we discuss principles and strategies for directed endosymbiosis and highlight current developments. We also describe several bacterial species as candidates for converting into organelles that would have interesting applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it