MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089368604 · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2020.09.008

Designer endosymbionts: Converting free-living bacteria into organelles

2020· article· en· W3089368604 on OpenAlexafffund
Rebecca S. Meaney, Samir Hamadache, Maximillian P. M. Soltysiak, Bogumil J. Karas

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Systems Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersWestern University
KeywordsEndosymbiosisOrganelleBiologyEukaryotic cellEvolutionary biologyComputational biologyChloroplastCell biologyPlastidGeneticsCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An emerging frontier in synthetic biology involves the engineering of interspecies relationships, one of which could result in the development of novel organelles. The endosymbiotic theory is the most widely accepted model for the evolutionary origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts, asserting that these organelles descended from free-living bacteria. Imitating this process experimentally, which we refer to herein as directed endosymbiosis, could enable the development of an entirely new class of organisms with synthetic organelles. In this review, we discuss principles and strategies for directed endosymbiosis and highlight current developments. We also describe several bacterial species as candidates for converting into organelles that would have interesting applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Systems BiologySame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207