MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089479710 · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101613

Few-Atomic-Layers Iron for Hydrogen Evolution from Water by Photoelectrocatalysis

2020· article· en· W3089479710 on OpenAlexafffund
Baowen Zhou, Pengfei Ou, Roksana Tonny Rashid, Srinivas Vanka, Kai Sun, Lin Yao, Haiding Sun, Jun Song, Zetian Mi

Bibliographic record

VenueiScience · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCompute CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEmissions Reduction AlbertaMcGill UniversityUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsHydrogenNanotechnologyChemistryChemical physicsAstrobiologyChemical engineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental chemistryBiologyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The carbon-free production of hydrogen from water splitting holds grand promise for the critical energy and environmental challenges. Herein, few-atomic-layers iron (Fe FAL ) anchored on GaN nanowire arrays (NWs) is demonstrated as a highly active hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst, attributing to the spatial confinement and the nitrogen-terminated surface of GaN NWs. Based on density functional theory calculations, the hydrogen adsorption on Fe FAL :GaN NWs is found to exhibit a significantly low free energy of −0.13 eV, indicative of high activity. Meanwhile, its outstanding optoelectronic properties are realized by the strong electronic coupling between atomic iron layers and GaN(10ī0) together with the nearly defect-free GaN NWs. As a result, Fe FAL :GaN NWs/n + -p Si exhibits a prominent current density of ∼ −30 mA cm −2 at an overpotential of ∼0.2 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode with a decent onset potential of +0.35 V and 98% Faradaic efficiency in 0.5 mol/L KHCO 3 aqueous solution under standard one-sun illumination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueiScienceSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207