Commentary: 3D-imaging and surgical precision: How small can the anatomic resection be?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central MessageVATS metastasectomy with middle lobe subsegmentectomy is facilitated by 3D computed tomography imaging.See Article page 309. VATS metastasectomy with middle lobe subsegmentectomy is facilitated by 3D computed tomography imaging. See Article page 309. Lung metastasectomy is a complementary step in the treatment of primary neoplasms at other sites. Guidelines based on retrospective series and analyses of large databases support the surgical resection of lung metastases when the primary cancer is controlled.1Handy J.R. Bremner R.M. Crocenzi T.S. Detterbeck F.C. Fernando H.C. Fidias P.M. et al.Expert consensus document on pulmonary metastasectomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107: 631-649Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar,2Li J. Yuan Y. Yang F. Wang Y. Zhu X. Wang Z. et al.Expert consensus on multidisciplinary therapy of colorectal cancer with lung metastases (2019 edition).J Hematol Oncol. 2019; 12: 16Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar Two concepts should be integrated when performing a metastasectomy: (1) a lung-sparing procedure and (2) a minimally invasive approach, which is known to yield superior functional outcomes, shorter hospital stays, and a shorter duration of chest tube drainage and epidural analgesia.3Numan R.C. Baas P. Klomp H.M. Wouters M.W. Optimal surgical management of pulmonary metastases: VATS versus thoracotomy.Respirology. 2016; 21: 188-190Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar One of the current oncologic criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy is that all of the tumor must be resectable with adequate pulmonary reserve.4Erhunmwunsee L. Tong B.C. Preoperative evaluation and indications for pulmonary metastasectomy.Thorac Surg Clin. 2016; 26: 7-12Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar Lung function testing is important during the preoperative evaluation, and cumulative parenchymal loss must be considered when multiple lesions are present.5Petrella F. Chieco P. Solli P. Veronesi G. Borri A. Galetta D. et al.Which factors affect pulmonary function after lung metastasectomy?.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009; 35: 792-796Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar Although parenchyma-sparing procedures, such as anatomic segmentectomy, remain the gold standard for treating lung metastases, it is unusual to perform anatomic segmentectomy of the middle lobe, because it is responsible for only about 15% of lung function.6Casiraghi M. Maisonneuve P. Brambilla D. Petrella F. Solli P. Guarize J. et al.The role of extended pulmonary metastasectomy.J Thorac Oncol. 2015; 10: 924-929Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar Limited pulmonary resection does not improve late postoperative lung function, and sublobar resections have a greater risk of air leak, as they do not follow anatomical planes.7Ginsberg R.J. Rubinstein L.V. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer study group.Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60: 615-623Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2340) Google Scholar,8Suzuki K. Saji H. Aokage K. Watanabe S.I. Okada M. Mizusawa J. et al.Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: safety results of a randomized trial.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 158: 895-907Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (247) Google Scholar It can also be difficult to ensure that the lesion is completely resected with adequate surgical margins. In this issue of JTCVS Techniques, Obayashi and colleagues9Obayashi K. Yajima T. Shimizu K. Shirabe K. Thoracoscopic S4a subsegmentectomy combined with wedge resections for treatment of metastatic tumors located at the intersection of the major and minor fissures.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 309-311Google Scholar present a case of a S4a subsegmentectomy performed together with wedge resections of the right upper lobe (RUL) and right lower lobe (RLL) for the resection of 3 lung metastases of colon cancer. The 53-year-old male patient had undergone resection for sigmoid colon cancer (pathologic stage IIIB) and presented with lung metastases 1 year after colon resection. One of the metastases was located in the upper segment of the RLL, and the other 2 were located close to the fissure between the middle lobe and the RUL. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging reconstruction facilitated the surgical planning and allowed precise localization of the lesions and vessels and assessment of the volume of parenchymal resection. The authors determined that the metastasis in the middle lobe was close to an artery and required anatomic resection, but they were concerned that right middle lobectomy with accompanying wedge resections of the RUL and RLL would be more extensive than necessary and instead opted for a procedure with greater preservation of the parenchyma. The accompanying video elegantly shows how the authors performed this subsegmental resection. After identifying the metastasis in the middle lobe by finger palpation to secure the surgical margin, they dissected the intersegmental plane between S4a and S4b using an electrocautery along the inflation-deflation line. The intersegmental vein (V2c) was resected because the metastasis in the RUL was located along this vein. After resecting V2c, the margin on the RUL side was resected using a stapler, and the RUL and middle lobe metastases were removed together. Subsequently, the RLL metastasis was removed by wedge resection. There were no postoperative complications, chest tube drainage was necessary for 2 days, and hospital stay length was 6 days. Segmental resection of the middle lobe, as performed by these authors, may be a good option for patients with impaired lung function. In patients who may develop new lung metastases, preservation of the lung parenchyma might allow future treatments. Reconstruction with 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging allows adequate and appropriate surgical planning for the performance of this type of complex procedure. In addition, video-assisted, minimally invasive, thoracoscopic surgery facilities anatomic lung-sparing resection when multiple nodules are present. The authors describe the technique in detail, with very informative images and a video of excellent quality. Thoracoscopic S4a subsegmentectomy combined with wedge resections for treatment of metastatic tumors located at the intersection of the major and minor fissuresJTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewA 53-year-old male patient underwent a lower anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer (CC; pathologic stage IIIB). Three pulmonary nodules appeared on postoperative computed tomography images 1 year after the operation; pulmonary metastases (PMs) from CC were suspected. Whole-body computed tomography showed that metastatic lesions were limited to the lung. The PMs were located in the right upper lobe (RUL), right middle lobe (RML), and right lower lobe (RLL) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The RUL PM and the RML PM were localized near the intersection of major and minor fissures and were close due to incomplete lobulation. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".