Investigating low temperature resistance in Brachypodium distachyon, a cold stress and crop model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low temperature poses one of the most biologically taxing and economically significant stresses for a variety of agricultural crops. To combat cold stress, resilient plants can undergo cold acclimation, a process involving intricately programmed genetic, metabolic, and physiological changes. Ice-binding proteins (IBPs), if present, are upregulated under cold stress and present great biotechnological potential for their ability to protect crops against pathogen-associated freezing damage responsible for widespread economic devastation. Until recently, functional investigation of IBPs via knockdown had not been attempted in any organism, but it was accomplished for the first time in the model crop, Brachypodium distachyon, which has emerged as an ideal experimental system for low temperature tolerance in plants. B. distachyon itself has no economical value of more than an invasive weed; however, the use as a model crop refers to the ease of use for research in place of typical crop species. These first IBP knockdowns proved problematic likely due to the pleiotropic effects of constitutive miRNA expression. Here I present a new strategy to generate transgenic B. distachyon containing a temporal miRNA-facilitated IBP knockdown wholly generated without using tissue culture or traditional genotyping techniques. Plants with temporal knockdown of IBPs confirmed the functional importance of IBPs under cold stress, without other obvious pleiotropic effects. Wildtype plants that had not been cold acclimated produced low, basal levels of IBP expression, suggesting that IBPs may be constitutively expressed for developmental needs and only upregulated under cold stress for protective measures. Although it could not be included as part of this thesis, preliminary assessment of the plasma membrane proteome showed that IBPs do not localize to the plasma membrane, with some potential new protein candidates for future studies on cold stress highlighted. Perhaps most importantly, the methods employed here for transgenic plant generation present an unprecedented level of processivity and low cost so that studies on these many newly identified proteins are now feasible. Thus, an additional legacy of this thesis could be an increasing accessibility and attractiveness of transgenic monocot research in the crucial years to come for humanity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".