MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Model Transformation for Enhanced Parameter Identification of Linear Dynamic Systems

2020· article· en· W3089597436 on OpenAlex
Leonam Pecly, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceEstimation theorySystem identificationQuantization (signal processing)Convergence (economics)Transformation (genetics)Noise (video)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsData modelingArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

System dynamics identification has an important role in engineering, such as for modeling, simulation of dynamic mechanisms and controller design. The accuracy of estimation certainly depends on how the input variables used for estimation are obtained. Often higher order derivatives of the measured independent variables suffer from noise and quantization error compromising the estimation accuracy and conversion. In this paper, we propose a method to avoid successive numerical differentiation for enhanced identification. The proposed method is evaluated using the Least Squares identification method through simulations of twenty sets of dynamic parameters and experiments on a single degree-of-freedom platform. The performance is evaluated in terms of parameter convergence and output prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it