MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089599615

On regulatory power, compliance, and the role of the Court of Justice in EU environmental law : Concluding chapter to the Research Handbook on EU environmental law

2020· article· en· W3089599615 on OpenAlexaff
M.G.W.M. Peeters, Mariolina Eliantonio

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Environmental Law and Policies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Council on Foreign Relations
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental lawEnforcementLegislationCompliance (psychology)LawPolitical scienceSection (typography)Environmental justiceEconomic JusticeScholarshipEnvironmental compliancePower (physics)Law and economicsEuropean unionBusinessSociologyInternational trade
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This concluding chapter provides overarching observations related to how the EU has used its regulatory power to steer towards environmentally friendly behaviour (section 2), will delve into the deep concerns related to the compliance with and enforcement of EU environmental law, thereby also highlighting the important role of civil society (section 3), and will characterize how the CJEU has contributed to the effective implementation of EU environmental legislation (section 4). Section 5 concludes with an outlook on EU environmental law scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternational Environmental Law and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207