Enabling Efficient, Secure and Privacy-Preserving Mobile Cloud Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile cloud storage (MCS) provides clients with convenient cloud storage service. In this article, we propose an efficient, secure and privacy-preserving mobile cloud storage scheme, which protects the data confidentiality and privacy simultaneously, especially the access pattern. Specifically, we propose an oblivious selection and update (OSU) protocol as the underlying primitive of the proposed mobile cloud storage scheme. OSU is based on onion additively homomorphic encryption with constant encryption layers and enables the client to obliviously retrieve an encrypted data item from the cloud and update it with a fresh value by generating a small encrypted vector, which significantly reduces the client’s computation as well as the communication overheads. Compared with previous works, our presented work has valuable properties, such as fine-grained data structure (small item size), lightweight client-side computation (a few of additively homomorphic operations) and constant communication overhead, which make it more suitable for MCS scenario. Moreover, by employing the “verification chunks” method, our scheme can be verifiable to resist malicious cloud. The comparison and evaluation indicate that our scheme is more efficient than existing oblivious storage solutions with the aspects of client and cloud workloads, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".