The effect of market confidence on a financial system from the perspective of fractional calculus: Numerical investigation and circuit realization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modeling and analysis of financial systems have been interesting topics among researchers. The more precisely we know dynamic of systems, the better we can deal with them. This way, in this paper, we investigate the effect of market confidence on a financial system from the perspective of fractional calculus. Market confidence, which is a significant concern in economic systems, is considered, and its effects are comprehensively investigated. The system has been studied through numerical simulations and analyses, such as the Lyapunov exponents, bifurcation diagrams, and phase portrait. It is shown that the system enters chaos through experiencing a cascade of period doublings, and the existence of chaos is verified. Finally, an analog circuit of the chaotic system is designed and implemented to prove its feasibility in real-world applications. Also, through the circuit implementation, the effects of different factors on the behavior of the systems are investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it