Discovery of genomic loci associated with sleep apnoea risk through multi-trait GWAS analysis with snoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Sleep apnoea is characterised by periods of halted breathing during sleep. Despite its association with severe health conditions, the aetiology of sleep apnoea remains understudied, and previous genetic analyses have not identified many robustly associated genetic risk variants. Methods We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of sleep apnoea across five cohorts (N Total =523,366), followed by a multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) to boost power, leveraging the high genetic correlation between sleep apnoea and snoring. We then adjusted our results for the genetic effects of body mass index (BMI) using multi-trait-based conditional & joint analysis (mtCOJO) and sought replication of lead hits in a large cohort of participants from 23andMe, Inc (N Total =1,477,352; N cases =175,522). We also explored genetic correlations with other complex traits and performed a phenome-wide screen for causally associated phenotypes using the latent causal variable method. Results Our MTAG analysis uncovered 49 significant independent loci associated with sleep apnoea risk. Twenty-nine variants were replicated in the 23andMe cohort. We observed genetic correlations with several complex traits, including multisite chronic pain, diabetes, eye disorders, high blood pressure, osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and BMI-associated conditions. Conclusions Our study uncovered multiple genetic loci associated with sleep apnoea risk, thus increasing our understanding of the aetiology of this condition and its relationship with other complex traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".