MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3089706791 · doi:10.1016/j.eats.2020.05.021

Bubble Sign to Confirm the Integrity of the Shoulder Rotator Cuff

2020· article· en· W3089706791 on OpenAlexaff
Maciej J. K. Simon, William D. Regan

Bibliographic record

VenueArthroscopy Techniques · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotator cuffMedicineCuffAir bubbleArthroscopySurgerySign (mathematics)InflowShoulder jointBubbleMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presence of an intra-articular air bubble adjacent to the rotator cuff at the time of diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy will confirm an intact rotator cuff and is helpful in ambiguous cases. After the introduction of the arthroscope, air is pulled owing to negative air pressure in the joint cavity. Fluid inflow is then started after the inflow has been properly flushed of all air. This creates an intra-articular air bubble, which can be found at the top of the capsular-supraspinatus attachment site in cases with an intact rotator cuff. Secondary subacromial positioning of the arthroscope is used to confirm the intact rotator cuff from the bursal side.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthroscopy TechniquesSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207