Pangenome sequence evolution within human gut microbiomes is explained by gene-specific rather than host-specific selective pressures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pangenomes – the cumulative set of genes encoded by a species – arise from evolutionary forces including horizontal gene transfer (HGT), drift, and selection. The relative importance of drift and selection in shaping pangenome structure has been recently debated, and the role of sequence evolution (point mutations) within mobile genes has been largely ignored, with studies focusing mainly on patterns of gene presence or absence. The effects of drift, selection, and HGT on pangenome evolution likely depends on the time scale being studied, ranging from ancient ( e.g. , between distantly related species) to recent ( e.g. , within a single animal host), and the unit of selection being considered ( e.g. , the gene, whole genome, microbial species, or human host). To shed light on pangenome evolution within microbiomes on relatively recent time scales, we investigate the selective pressures acting on mobile genes using a dataset that previously identified such genes in the gut metagenomes of 176 Fiji islanders. We mapped the metagenomic reads to mobile genes to call single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and calculate population genetic metrics that allowed us to infer deviations from a neutral evolutionary model. We found that mobile gene sequence evolution varied more by gene family than by human social attributes, such as household or village membership, suggesting that selection at the level of gene function is most relevant on these short time scales. Patterns of mobile gene sequence evolution could be qualitatively recapitulated with a simple evolutionary simulation, without the need to invoke an adaptive advantage of mobile genes to their bacterial host genome. This suggests that, at least on short time scales, a majority of the pangenome need not be adaptive. On the other hand, a subset of gene functions including defense mechanisms and secondary metabolism showed an aberrant pattern of molecular evolution, consistent with species-specific selective pressures or negative frequency-dependent selection not seen in prophages, transposons, or other gene categories. That mobile genes of different functions behave so differently suggests stronger selection at the gene level, rather than at the genome level. While pangenomes may be largely adaptive to their bacterial hosts on longer evolution time scales, here we show that, on shorter “human” time scales, drift and gene-specific selection predominate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".