Learning to Beamform for Intelligent Reflecting Surface with Implicit Channel Estimate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent reflecting surface (IRS), consisting of massive number of tunable reflective elements, is capable of boosting spectral efficiency between a base station (BS) and a user by intelligently tuning the phase shifters at the IRS according to the channel state information (CSI). However, due to the large number of passive elements which cannot transmit and receive signals, acquisition of CSI for IRS is a practically challenging task. Instead of using the received pilots to estimate the channels explicitly, this paper shows that it is possible to learn the effective IRS reflection pattern and beamforming at the BS directly based on the received pilots. This is achieved by parameterizing the mapping from the received pilots to the optimal configuration of IRS and the beamforming matrix at the BS by properly tuning a deep neural network using unsupervised training. Simulation results indicate that the proposed neural network can efficiently learn to maximize the system sum rate from much fewer received pilots as compared to the traditional channel estimation based solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".