Vascular origins of low-frequency oscillations in the cerebrospinal fluid signal in resting-state fMRI: Interpretation using photoplethysmography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Slow and rhythmic spontaneous oscillations of cerebral blood flow are well known to have diagnostic utility, notably frequencies of 0.008-0.03 Hz (B-waves) and 0.05-0.15Hz (Mayer waves or M waves). However, intracranial measurements of these oscillations have been difficult. Oscillations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which are influenced by the cardiac pulse wave, represent a possible avenue for non-invasively tracking these oscillations using resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), and have been used to correct for vascular oscillations in rs-fMRI functional connectivity calculations. However, the relationship between low-frequency CSF and vascular oscillations is unclear. In this study, we investigate this relationship using fast simultaneous multi-slice rs-fMRI coupled with fingertip photoplethysmography (PPG). We not only extract B-wave and M-wave range spectral power from the PPG signal, but also derive the pulse-intensity ratio (PIR, a surrogate of slow blood-pressure oscillations), the second-derivative of the PPG (SDPPG, a surrogate of arterial stiffness) and heart-rate variability (HRV). The main findings of this study are: (1) signals in different CSF regions (ROIs) are not equivalent in their vascular contributions or in their associations with vascular and tissue rs-fMRI signals; (2) the PPG signal contains the highest signal contribution from the M-wave range, while PIR contains the highest signal contribution from the B-wave range; (3) in the low-frequency range, PIR is more strongly associated with rs-fMRI signal in the CSF than PPG itself, and than HRV and SDPPG; (4) PPG-related vascular oscillations only contribute to < 20% of the CSF signal in rs-fMRI, insufficient support for the assumption that low-frequency CSF signal fluctuations directly reflect vascular oscillations. These findings caution the use of CSF as a monolithic region for extracting physiological nuisance regressors in rs-fMRI applications. They also pave the way for using rs-fMRI in the CSF as a potential tool for tracking cerebrovascular health through, for instance the strong relationship between PIR and the CSF signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".