ANGGARAN RESPONSIF GENDER PADA APBD PROVINSI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR TAHUN 2017-2019
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alokasi anggaran responsif gender pada APBD Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT) tahun 2017-2019. Rumusan masalah dari penelitian ini adalah apakah Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi NTT telah mengalokasikan anggaran responsif gender pada APBD Provinsi NTT tahun 2017-2019. Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Objek dari penelitian ini adalah 3 Organisasi Perangkat Daerah (OPD) Provinsi NTT yaitu Dinas Pendidikan, Dinas Kesehatan, Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan dokumentasi dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Dinas Pendidikan belum mengalokasikan anggaran yang responsif gender (netral gender), Dinas Kesehatan telah mengalokasikan anggaran yang responsif gender dengan kategori spesific gender dan Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak telah mangalokasikan anggaran yang responsif gender dengan kategori specific gender dan affirmative action meskipun alokasi anggarannya relatif kecil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".