MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090008919 · doi:10.1504/ijwmc.2020.10032469

An enhanced multilevel ML-DFT codebook algorithm for hybrid beamforming of millimetre wave MIMO systems

2020· article· en· W3090008919 on OpenAlexaff
M.A. Mangoud, Isa Altoobaji

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Wireless and Mobile Computing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookComputer sciencePrecodingBasebandBeamformingMIMOAlgorithmElectronic engineeringTransceiverBase stationWirelessPath lossTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millimetre Wave (mmWave) wireless communication is considered an enabling technology to allow 5G cellular achieving high data rates. Large-scale antenna arrays can be adopted to compensate the huge path loss at higher frequencies. MIMO precoding cannot be performed only at baseband due to high power consumption of signal mixers and analogue-to-digital converters. Therefore, hybrid analogue-digital architecture at transceiver is considered as a cost-effective precoding scheme. However, the optimal design of such hybrid precoders and combiners needs to be further investigated. In this paper, a maximum likelihood (ML) beamforming technique is used for estimating signal's direction of departure in the presence of random noise. Moreover, an enhanced Orthogonal Mapping-based Matching Pursuit (OMBMP) algorithm is proposed. Layered orthogonal codebook is used to adjust base stations beamformers. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed architecture provides acceptable performance gain with almost 90% of the performance of optimal full-digital precoder with great reduced complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Wireless and Mobile ComputingSame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207