Dynamic Modeling of a Planetary Gearbox with Sun Gear Crack and Bearing Clearance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Planetary gearboxes are widely used in industrial applications, such as wind turbines, automobiles, and mining equipment. Although well designed, planetary gearboxes may experience failures if no early detection is conducted due to harsh working environment, such as high torque and heavy dust. To improve system reliability and reduce maintenance cost, it is important to carry out early fault detection. This study investigates the dynamic responses of a planetary gearbox with a tooth root crack in the sun gear. Reported studies have not considered the effects of bearing clearance on dynamic responses of planetary gearboxes with sun gear tooth crack. In this study, we consider the carrier bearing clearance, planet gear bearing clearance, and sun gear bearing clearance in a planetary gearbox with fixed ring gear. Simulation results reveal that if the bearing clearance is much smaller than the displacement of its corresponding gear, the clearance will not affect the dynamic response. Otherwise, the clearance will increase the displacement of its corresponding gear and change the dynamic responses of other gears.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".