MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090022602 · doi:10.1190/geo2020-0192.1

Null-space shuttles for targeted uncertainty analysis in full-waveform inversion

2020· article· en· W3090022602 on OpenAlexafffund
Scott Keating, K. A. Innanen

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInversion (geology)Curse of dimensionalityMathematical optimizationUncertainty quantificationUncertainty analysisMathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmParameter spaceApplied mathematicsStatisticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is an effective tool for recovering subsurface information, but many factors make this recovery subject to uncertainty. In particular, unwanted noise in measurements can bias results toward models that are not representative of the true subsurface and numerical optimization techniques used in the inversion only allow for approximate minimization of the objective function. Both factors contribute to the nonuniqueness of FWI solutions. Assessing the uncertainty that this nonuniqueness introduces can be difficult, due to the large dimensionality of the inversion problem. Fortunately, complete characterization of inversion uncertainty is seldom necessary for applications using an inversion result, meaning that the entire dimensionality of the problem may not be relevant for practical uncertainty quantification. Typically, it is only the uncertainty in a few specific aspects of the inversion that is important (for instance, confidence in a recovered anomaly). A targeted uncertainty quantification, characterizing only the confidence in a specific feature of the subsurface model, can greatly reduce the dimensionality of the uncertainty characterization problem, potentially making it tractable. We have adopted an approach for quantifying the confidence of the inversion in a chosen hypothesis about the recovered subsurface model. We tested each hypothesis through numerical optimization on the set of equal-objective model-space steps, called null-space shuttles. By approximating the null-space shuttle that maximally violates a given hypothesis about the inversion, this method establishes an effective approximation of the uncertainty in that hypothesis. We tested the use of this technique on several numerical examples for the case of viscoelastic inversion. These examples demonstrate that, at a reasonable computational cost, this method can generate estimates of the lower bound on the maximal uncertainty associated with incomplete numerical optimization. In the viscoelastic examples considered, the velocity variables are much better constrained than the Q and density variables according to this metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207