Peran Koperasi Wanita Terhadap Keberdayaan Perempuan Di Koperasi Wanita “Bunda Pertiwi” Desa Kraton Yosowilangun Kabupaten Lumajang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seiring dengan perkembangan dan tuntutan akan kemajuan koperasi wanita dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan dan meningkatkan kualitas sumber daya anggotanya, Maka sesuai dengan peran koperasi wanita yaitu meninggkatkan kesejahteraan serta meningkatkan kualitas SDM.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui peran koperasi wanita terhadap keberdayaan perempuan di koperasi Wanita Bunda Pertiwi desa Kraton Yosowilangun Lumajang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah korelasional dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif Tempat penelitian ini di Koperasi Bunda Pertiwi di Desa Kraton Yosowilanggun Kabupaten Lumajang. penentuan responden menggunakan metode Populasi. Data penelitian terdiri atas data primer dan sekunder. Data primer dari penelitian ini diperoleh dari perhitungan hasil dari pengisian angket oleh responden yaitu anggota koperasi Bunda Pertiwi dan data data skunder diperoleh dari Dokumentasi dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan adanya peran koperasi wanita terhadap keberdayaan perempuan di koperasi wanita Bunda Pertiwi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".