Social Interaction and Information Diffusion in Social Internet of Things: Dynamics, Cloud-Edge, Traceability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Social Internet of Things (SIoT), integrating the social networks and Internet of Things (IoT), leads to heterogeneous interactions of thing to thing, human to human, and human to thing, which in turn generates exploded information. Hence, as the soul of SIoT, information with its interaction and diffusion, records the track of humans and things and contains the hidden value for social administration and people's lives. Therefore, how to characterize the interplay between behavior spreading and information diffusion in SIoT is essential to predict and manage the information. Motivated by this, a more comprehensive understanding of the coupled modeling of social interaction and information diffusion processes in SIoT is conceived first. With the widespread adoption of cloud-edge computing, different nodes have different consciousness on information. Hence, a cloud-edge-aided information diffusion model is proposed for efficient interactions, which incorporates the role of edge in timely processing and feedback. On this basis, a blockchain-based cloud-edge SIoT architecture is proposed for traceability and security of information diffusion. Furthermore, the dynamical analysis of the coupled model in SIoT is provided, which illustrates the outbreak threshold, stability, and scale of information propagation. An interesting finding is that interactive behavior spreading only influences the final size of information propagation, not the spreading threshold. Extensive simulation results and detailed performance analysis verify the theoretical results, which are beneficial to provide traceable dissemination so as to find the most influential node and control the scale of information diffusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it