Recognition of speech emotion using custom 2D-convolution neural network deep learning algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Speech emotion recognition has become the heart of most human computer interaction applications in the modern world. The growing need to develop emotionally intelligent devices has opened up a lot of research opportunities. Most researchers in this field have applied the use of handcrafted features and machine learning techniques in recognising speech emotion. However, these techniques require extra processing steps and handcrafted features are usually not robust. They are computationally intensive because the curse of dimensionality results in low discriminating power. Research has shown that deep learning algorithms are effective for extracting robust and salient features in dataset. In this study, we have developed a custom 2D-convolution neural network that performs both feature extraction and classification of vocal utterances. The neural network has been evaluated against deep multilayer perceptron neural network and deep radial basis function neural network using the Berlin database of emotional speech, Ryerson audio-visual emotional speech database and Surrey audio-visual expressed emotion corpus. The described deep learning algorithm achieves the highest precision, recall and F1-scores when compared to other existing algorithms. It is observed that there may be need to develop customized solutions for different language settings depending on the area of applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".