Le cercle pédagogique : pour développer les savoirs et les pratiques d’enseignement en grammaire actuelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude porte sur les effets de la mise en œuvre d’un dispositif de développement professionnel appelé « cercle pédagogique » sur les pratiques effec-tives des enseignants participants. Des observations sur vidéo, réalisées dans la classe des participants, avant et après la formation d’une durée d’un an ont permis de constater que la majorité des enseignants a développé, d’une part, des savoirs grammaticaux acquis lors de la formation, soit un métalangage et un raisonnement grammatical et, d’autre part, des pratiques pédagogiques liées au cadre con-ceptuel de la didactique de la grammaire actuelle. La discussion porte sur les caractéristiques du cercle pédagogique qui contribuent au développement des pratiques pédagogiques et des savoirs liés à la grammaire actuelle et à son enseignement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".