Paket Informasi Literasi Budaya di Perkampungan Nelayan Kampung Batu, Batang Arau, Padang Selatan, Kota Padang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThis paper discusses the creation of a cultural literacy information package at Kampung Batu Fisheries Village, Batang Arau, Padang Selatan, Padang City. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of creating a Cultural Literacy Information Package at Kampung Batu Fisheries Village, Batang Arau, Padang Selatan, Padang City. This research uses a descriptive method. Data was collected through literature review and direct observation and interviews with the Chairperson of RW, Fishermen and Community Leaders at Kampung Batu Fisheries Village, located in RW II, Batang Arau Sub-District, Padang Selatan District, Padang City. The information package is made through five stages. (1) Determining topics and types of packaging information packages, the topics raised were Cultural Literacy at Kampung Batu Fisheries Village, Batang Arau, Padang Selatan, Kota Padang; (2) Collection of information carried out by means of literature searches and interviews and direct observations to Kampung Batu Fisheries Village; (3) Analysis of the results of information gathering, it is known that things considered important as builders of the cultural identity of fishing communities such as gender systems, patron-client relations, patterns of resource exploitation, and social leadership; (4) Information packaging, carried out by presenting information that has been obtained from the collection of information in the form of information packages; (5) Evaluation of information packages carried out by submitting questionnaires to respondents and note that 92.4% of respondents strongly agree that information packages on cultural literacy are interesting, are informative and have use values.Keywords: information package; cultural literacy; fisherman
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".