MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090419791 · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.017

A clinical evaluation of a novel algorithm in the reliable detection of epileptic seizures

2020· article· en· W3090419791 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ruth Brotherstone, Ailsa McLellan, Catriona Graham, Katie Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueSeizure · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsEpilepsyAlgorithmComputer sciencePsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Undetected and prolonged epileptic seizures can result in hypoxic brain damage or death and occur most often when the victim is in bed alone or unsupervised. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy may not always be preventable but it is believed that timely assistance with rescue medication and body re-positioning may overcome respiratory compromise in some cases. A novel algorithm based on a real time moving 9 s epoch, calculating 25 % percentage heart rate change and/or an oxygen saturation trigger level of <85 % was developed using photoplethysmography and incorporated into a prototype data storage device. METHODS: The algorithm was clinically evaluated in this multicentre trial in the detection of clinically significant epileptic seizures. A range of epileptic seizures and normal physiological events were recorded and classified by reference standard EEG Videotelemetry and time-synchronised event data recorded by the prototype device incorporating the pre-specified cut-off points prospectively and retrospective analysis of all events. RESULTS: 119 participants who were attending electroencephalographic (EEG) videotelemetry as part of their clinical management of their epilepsy consented to take part in the trial. 683 epileptic seizures (77 clinically significant seizures) and 2648 normal physiological events were captured. When using pre-specified cut-off point 25 % heart rate change and/or oxygen desaturation <85 % on the basis of one/other, the device showed a sensitivity of 87 % for detecting clinically significant seizures. False Alarm Rate 4.5 (24 h FAR), detection latency of 58 s using heart rate percentage change. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the novel algorithm can be used in detecting clinically significant seizures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeizureSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207