MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dynamic Network Link Prediction by Learning Effective Subgraphs using CNN-LSTM

2020· article· en· W3090461013 on OpenAlexaff
Kalyani Selvarajah, Kumaran Ragunathan, Ziad Kobti, Mehdi Kargar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConstruct (python library)Link (geometry)Convolutional neural networkDynamic network analysisHeuristicProcess (computing)Machine learningSet (abstract data type)Artificial neural networkData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting the future link between nodes is a significant problem in social network analysis, known as Link Prediction (LP). Recently, dynamic network link prediction has attracted many researchers due to its valuable real-world applications. However, most methods fail to perform satisfying prediction accuracy in various types of networks because the dynamic LP in evolving networks is struggling with spatial and nonlinear transitional patterns. Besides this, existing methods mostly involve the whole network and target link for the LP process. It leads to high computational costs. This paper aims to address these issues by proposing a novel framework named DLP-LES using deep learning methods. DLP-LES uses common neighbors based subgraph of a target link and learns the transitional pattern of it for a given dynamic network. We extract a set of heuristic features of the evolving subgraph to gather additional information about the target link. In this way, we avoid examining the entire network. Additionally, our model introduces new mechanisms to reduce computational costs. DLP- LES generates a lookup table to keep the required information of links of the network and uses a hashing method to store and fetch link information. We propose an algorithm to construct feature matrices of the evolving subgraph to learn transitional link patterns. Our model transforms the dynamic link prediction to a video classification problem, and uses Convolutional Neural Networks with Long Short-Term Memory neural networks. To verify the effectiveness of DLP-LES, extensive experiments are carried out on five real-world dynamic networks. We compare those results against four network embedding methods and basic heuristic methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207