MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090464646 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2020.3028472

Frequency Regulation in Isolated Microgrids Through Optimal Droop Gain and Voltage Control

2020· article· en· W3090464646 on OpenAlexafffund
Baheej Alghamdi, Claudio A. Cañizares

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKing Abdulaziz University
KeywordsVoltage droopSetpointControl theory (sociology)MicrogridAC powerAutomatic frequency controlController (irrigation)Sensitivity (control systems)EngineeringVoltageVoltage regulationElectric power systemDistributed generationBenchmark (surveying)Power controlPower (physics)Voltage regulatorComputer scienceElectronic engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an adaptive active power droop controller and voltage setpoint control in isolated microgrids for optimal frequency response and stability after disturbances. The control scheme involves an optimal and model predictive control approach that continuously adjusts the active power droop gains and the voltage setpoints of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) to maintain the frequency of the system within acceptable limits and enhance the primary frequency response of the system, while taking into account the active power sensitivity of the microgrid loads to the system's operating voltage. The proposed control scheme is tested, validated, and compared with previously proposed techniques using time-domain simulations for a test system based on a CIGRE medium voltage benchmark microgrid under different realistic conditions, demonstrating the advantages of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations125
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207