MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090495827 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3027805

Tissue-Type Classification With Uncertainty Quantification of Microwave and Ultrasound Breast Imaging: A Deep Learning Approach

2020· article· en· W3090495827 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedram Mojabi, Vahab Khoshdel, Joe LoVetri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkMicrowave imagingIterative reconstructionPattern recognition (psychology)PixelMammographyUltrasonic sensorArtificial neural networkMicrowaveAcousticsPhysicsBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A deep learning approach is proposed for performing tissue-type classification of tomographic microwave and ultrasound property images of the breast. The approach is based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) utilizing the U-net architecture that also quantifies the uncertainty in the classification of each pixel. Quantitative tomographic reconstructions of dielectric properties (complex-valued permittivity), ultrasonic properties (compressibility and attenuation), as well as their combination, with the corresponding actual tissue-type classification constitute the training set. The CNN learns to map the quantitative property reconstructions to a single tissue-type image. The level of confidence in predicting a tissue-type at each pixel is determined. This uncertainty quantification is diagnostically critical for biomedical applications, especially when attempting to distinguish between cancerous and healthy tissues. The Gauss-Newton Inversion algorithm is used for the quantitative reconstruction of both dielectric and ultrasonic properties. Electromagnetic and ultrasound scattered-field data is obtained from MRI-derived numerical breast phantoms. Several numerical breast phantoms types, from fatty to dense, are considered. The proposed classification and uncertainty quantification approach is shown to outperform a previously studied tissue-type classification method based on a Bayesian approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207