MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090529546 · doi:10.1353/ari.2020.0033

Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing by Andrea Medovarski

2020· article· en· W3090529546 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAriel · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaSettlingCitizenshipDepictionGender studiesSociologyArtLiteratureLawPolitical scienceEngineeringPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing by Andrea Medovarski Paul Barrett (bio) Andrea Medovarski. Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing. U of Toronto P, 2019. Pp. 208. CAD $37.50. Andrea Medovarski's Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing offers a compelling analysis of the depiction of second-generation citizens in Black Canadian and Black British women's fiction. Through a series of nuanced readings of the work of Dionne Brand, Tessa McWatt, Zadie Smith, Esi Edugyan, and Andrea Levy, Medovarski traces the manner in which second-generation citizens "'settle up' with the nation, to remake citizenship on other, more ethical or more [End Page 188] inclusive terms" (15; emphasis in original). Her readings complicate conceptions of the relationship between race, citizenship, nation, and diaspora by focusing not on the generation that arrives but on the second generation that "envision[s] alternative spaces from which citizens can make ethical demands of nations in the interest of looking towards different futures, new heterogeneities, and other possibilities" (168). Medovarski's reading offers a compelling reappraisal of ideas of diaspora and nation by comparing these two distinct literary traditions. Settling Down begins with a description of the state of critical discourse "[i] n the early 1990s" (3) and the book is decidedly a product of those debates and that time both in its methods and citational practices. The strength of such an approach is that it enables Medovarski to foreground the disruptive potential of diaspora; this is particularly important given the recent slide in the term's critical currency within Canadian studies. Yet the weakness of such an approach is that the book is oddly non-conversant with more recent scholarship. With the exception of a handful of citations, the bulk of the text's references predate 2006. A great deal has happened in Canadian studies, Black studies, and diaspora studies in the subsequent fourteen years. Indeed, given the transformation in discourses of migrancy, diaspora, and citizenship in the past decade, Medovarski's book misses an important opportunity to intervene in more contemporary discussions. Furthermore, Medovarski does not precisely articulate her position in relation to her critical precursors. It is never entirely clear how Medovarski places Avtar Brah's diaspora space in dialogue with Édouard Glissant's poetics of relation or Paul Gilroy's Black Atlantic. Her argument that "'diaspora space' … is 'inhabited' not only by diasporic subjects but equally by those who are constructed and represented as 'indigenous'" (5) is provocative yet underdeveloped. Indeed, given George Elliott Clarke's argument that Canada is marginalized within Gilroy's Black Atlantic, as well as Clarke's own controversial claims concerning Africadian Indigeneity, it is surprising that Medovarsksi never cites or draws on his work. Similarly, her conclusion raises Sylvia Wynter's concept of the "counter-novel" (168) without fully articulating how each of the novels she studies engages in counter-hegemonic practices. Indeed, the book gestures toward but does not entirely engage with a number of important critical debates. This is particularly evident in the comparative frame of Medovarski's analysis: more work needs to be done to specify the distinction between British and Canadian conceptions of citizenship and the two countries' strategies of managing difference. She refers to the "Canadian Multiculturalism Act" and the "British Race Relations Act" as [End Page 189] two policies that "largely … discipline and contain 'others'" (25). This is certainly true, but there are substantial differences between the two documents, their legislative enactment, and the means by which local communities have resisted that management. Blackness and migrancy have been depicted, in literary and public discourse alike, very differently in Canada and Britain; a more nuanced analysis of the two political environments in which the writers under discussion operate is needed. These limitations aside, however, one of Settling Down's strengths is its sustained and impressive attention to literary works. In contrast with some contemporary literary scholarship, which skims poetry and prose as mere evidence for sweeping theoretical arguments, Medovarski attends to literary complexity. Her...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it