MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090529546 · doi:10.1353/ari.2020.0033

Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing by Andrea Medovarski

2020· article· en· W3090529546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul W. Barrett

Bibliographic record

VenueAriel · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaSettlingCitizenshipDepictionGender studiesSociologyArtLiteratureLawPolitical scienceEngineeringPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing by Andrea Medovarski Paul Barrett (bio) Andrea Medovarski. Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing. U of Toronto P, 2019. Pp. 208. CAD $37.50. Andrea Medovarski's Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing offers a compelling analysis of the depiction of second-generation citizens in Black Canadian and Black British women's fiction. Through a series of nuanced readings of the work of Dionne Brand, Tessa McWatt, Zadie Smith, Esi Edugyan, and Andrea Levy, Medovarski traces the manner in which second-generation citizens "'settle up' with the nation, to remake citizenship on other, more ethical or more [End Page 188] inclusive terms" (15; emphasis in original). Her readings complicate conceptions of the relationship between race, citizenship, nation, and diaspora by focusing not on the generation that arrives but on the second generation that "envision[s] alternative spaces from which citizens can make ethical demands of nations in the interest of looking towards different futures, new heterogeneities, and other possibilities" (168). Medovarski's reading offers a compelling reappraisal of ideas of diaspora and nation by comparing these two distinct literary traditions. Settling Down begins with a description of the state of critical discourse "[i] n the early 1990s" (3) and the book is decidedly a product of those debates and that time both in its methods and citational practices. The strength of such an approach is that it enables Medovarski to foreground the disruptive potential of diaspora; this is particularly important given the recent slide in the term's critical currency within Canadian studies. Yet the weakness of such an approach is that the book is oddly non-conversant with more recent scholarship. With the exception of a handful of citations, the bulk of the text's references predate 2006. A great deal has happened in Canadian studies, Black studies, and diaspora studies in the subsequent fourteen years. Indeed, given the transformation in discourses of migrancy, diaspora, and citizenship in the past decade, Medovarski's book misses an important opportunity to intervene in more contemporary discussions. Furthermore, Medovarski does not precisely articulate her position in relation to her critical precursors. It is never entirely clear how Medovarski places Avtar Brah's diaspora space in dialogue with Édouard Glissant's poetics of relation or Paul Gilroy's Black Atlantic. Her argument that "'diaspora space' … is 'inhabited' not only by diasporic subjects but equally by those who are constructed and represented as 'indigenous'" (5) is provocative yet underdeveloped. Indeed, given George Elliott Clarke's argument that Canada is marginalized within Gilroy's Black Atlantic, as well as Clarke's own controversial claims concerning Africadian Indigeneity, it is surprising that Medovarsksi never cites or draws on his work. Similarly, her conclusion raises Sylvia Wynter's concept of the "counter-novel" (168) without fully articulating how each of the novels she studies engages in counter-hegemonic practices. Indeed, the book gestures toward but does not entirely engage with a number of important critical debates. This is particularly evident in the comparative frame of Medovarski's analysis: more work needs to be done to specify the distinction between British and Canadian conceptions of citizenship and the two countries' strategies of managing difference. She refers to the "Canadian Multiculturalism Act" and the "British Race Relations Act" as [End Page 189] two policies that "largely … discipline and contain 'others'" (25). This is certainly true, but there are substantial differences between the two documents, their legislative enactment, and the means by which local communities have resisted that management. Blackness and migrancy have been depicted, in literary and public discourse alike, very differently in Canada and Britain; a more nuanced analysis of the two political environments in which the writers under discussion operate is needed. These limitations aside, however, one of Settling Down's strengths is its sustained and impressive attention to literary works. In contrast with some contemporary literary scholarship, which skims poetry and prose as mere evidence for sweeping theoretical arguments, Medovarski attends to literary complexity. Her...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0300.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArielSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207