MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3090529546 · doi:10.1353/ari.2020.0033

Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing by Andrea Medovarski

2020· article· en· W3090529546 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAriel · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiasporaSettlingCitizenshipDepictionGender studiesSociologyArtLiteratureLawPolitical scienceEngineeringPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing by Andrea Medovarski Paul Barrett (bio) Andrea Medovarski. Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing. U of Toronto P, 2019. Pp. 208. CAD $37.50. Andrea Medovarski's Settling Down and Settling Up: The Second Generation in Black Canadian and Black British Women's Writing offers a compelling analysis of the depiction of second-generation citizens in Black Canadian and Black British women's fiction. Through a series of nuanced readings of the work of Dionne Brand, Tessa McWatt, Zadie Smith, Esi Edugyan, and Andrea Levy, Medovarski traces the manner in which second-generation citizens "'settle up' with the nation, to remake citizenship on other, more ethical or more [End Page 188] inclusive terms" (15; emphasis in original). Her readings complicate conceptions of the relationship between race, citizenship, nation, and diaspora by focusing not on the generation that arrives but on the second generation that "envision[s] alternative spaces from which citizens can make ethical demands of nations in the interest of looking towards different futures, new heterogeneities, and other possibilities" (168). Medovarski's reading offers a compelling reappraisal of ideas of diaspora and nation by comparing these two distinct literary traditions. Settling Down begins with a description of the state of critical discourse "[i] n the early 1990s" (3) and the book is decidedly a product of those debates and that time both in its methods and citational practices. The strength of such an approach is that it enables Medovarski to foreground the disruptive potential of diaspora; this is particularly important given the recent slide in the term's critical currency within Canadian studies. Yet the weakness of such an approach is that the book is oddly non-conversant with more recent scholarship. With the exception of a handful of citations, the bulk of the text's references predate 2006. A great deal has happened in Canadian studies, Black studies, and diaspora studies in the subsequent fourteen years. Indeed, given the transformation in discourses of migrancy, diaspora, and citizenship in the past decade, Medovarski's book misses an important opportunity to intervene in more contemporary discussions. Furthermore, Medovarski does not precisely articulate her position in relation to her critical precursors. It is never entirely clear how Medovarski places Avtar Brah's diaspora space in dialogue with Édouard Glissant's poetics of relation or Paul Gilroy's Black Atlantic. Her argument that "'diaspora space' … is 'inhabited' not only by diasporic subjects but equally by those who are constructed and represented as 'indigenous'" (5) is provocative yet underdeveloped. Indeed, given George Elliott Clarke's argument that Canada is marginalized within Gilroy's Black Atlantic, as well as Clarke's own controversial claims concerning Africadian Indigeneity, it is surprising that Medovarsksi never cites or draws on his work. Similarly, her conclusion raises Sylvia Wynter's concept of the "counter-novel" (168) without fully articulating how each of the novels she studies engages in counter-hegemonic practices. Indeed, the book gestures toward but does not entirely engage with a number of important critical debates. This is particularly evident in the comparative frame of Medovarski's analysis: more work needs to be done to specify the distinction between British and Canadian conceptions of citizenship and the two countries' strategies of managing difference. She refers to the "Canadian Multiculturalism Act" and the "British Race Relations Act" as [End Page 189] two policies that "largely … discipline and contain 'others'" (25). This is certainly true, but there are substantial differences between the two documents, their legislative enactment, and the means by which local communities have resisted that management. Blackness and migrancy have been depicted, in literary and public discourse alike, very differently in Canada and Britain; a more nuanced analysis of the two political environments in which the writers under discussion operate is needed. These limitations aside, however, one of Settling Down's strengths is its sustained and impressive attention to literary works. In contrast with some contemporary literary scholarship, which skims poetry and prose as mere evidence for sweeping theoretical arguments, Medovarski attends to literary complexity. Her...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,575
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,910

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle