MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090636949 · doi:10.32678/holistic.v5i2.3234

Musibah dalam Perspektif Hadis

2019· article· id· W3090636949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHolistic al-Hadis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and Radicalism
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pembahasan musibah tidak lepas dari bencana, pembahasan musibah terdapat pada Alquran dan Hadis, musibah yang terjadi sering dikaitkan karena adanya sebab akibat dari ulah manusia itu sendiri, dari pernyataan tersebut masyarakat mengira bahwa bencana yang sering terjadi setiap tahunnya disebabkan oleh azab yang diturunkan oleh Allah SWT untuk menegur manusia.
 bencana atau musibah terjadi bukan hanya karena ulah tangan manusia, melainkan ada faktor alam dan takdir yang menyebabkan adanya bencana yang menimpa manusia di muka bumi. Tetapi meskipun begitu manusia harus tetap menjaga lingkungan agar dapat meminimalisir bencana yang sewaktu-waktu terjadi tanpa bisa diprediksi oleh tekhnologi.
 Adapun sikap yang harus manusia ambil dalam menghadapi bencana yaitu, seperti ridha dan ikhlas terhadap segala ketetapan yang telah Allah SWT turunkan kepada manusia, mencari pelajaran atau hikmah atas bencana yang menimpa manusia, baik karena faktor alam atau karena ulah tangan manusia. Selain itu, manusia harus memiliki sikap empati terhadap muslim lainnya dan mendoakan yang terbaik atas takdir yang diberikan Allah SWT kepada manusia, karena sesama muslim adalah saudara.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it