MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Policy Extraction via Online Q-Value Distillation

2020· article· en· W3090729135 on OpenAlex
Aman Jhunjhunwala, Jaeyoung Lee, Sean Sedwards, Vahdat Abdelzad, Krzysztof Czarnecki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDistillationArtificial neural networkDecision treeFunction (biology)Artificial intelligenceMonte Carlo tree searchMachine learningValue (mathematics)Monte Carlo methodAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep neural networks are capable of solving complex control tasks in challenging environments, but their learned policies are hard to interpret. Not being able to explain or verify them limits their practical applicability. By contrast, decision trees lend themselves well to explanation and verification, but are not easy to train, especially in an online fashion. In this work we introduce Q-BSP trees and propose an Ordered Sequential Monte Carlo training algorithm that efficiently distills the Q-function from fully trained deep Q-networks into a tree structure. Q-BSP forests are used to generate the partitioning rules that transparently reconstruct an accurate value function. We explain our approach and provide results that convincingly beat earlier online policy distillation methods with respect to their own performance benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it