Exploring heteroaromatic rings as a replacement for the labile amide of antiplasmodial pantothenamides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Plasmodium parasites that cause malaria are adept at developing resistance to antimalarial drugs, necessitating the search for new antiplasmodials. Although several amide analogs of pantothenate (pantothenamides) show potent antiplasmodial activity, hydrolysis by pantetheinases (or vanins) present in blood rapidly inactivates them. We report herein the facile synthesis and biological activity of a small library of pantothenamide analogs in which the labile amide group is replaced with a variety of heteroaromatic rings. Several of the new analogs display antiplasmodial activity in the nanomolar range against P. falciparum and/or P. knowlesi in the presence of pantetheinase. A previously reported triazole and an isoxazole derivative presented here were further characterized and found to possess high selectivity indices, medium or high Caco-2 permeability, and medium or low microsomal clearance in vitro . Although we show here that the two compounds fail to suppress proliferation of P. berghei in vivo , pharmacokinetic and contact time data presented provide a benchmark for the compound profile required to achieve antiplasmodial activity in mice and should facilitate lead optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".