MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090758262 · doi:10.1016/j.snr.2020.100020

Sensing guanine and its derivatives: From molecular recognition to applications

2020· article· en· W3090758262 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuqing Li, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors and Actuators Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGuanineMolecular recognitionNucleic acidCombinatorial chemistrySmall moleculeChemistryComputational biologyNanotechnologyMoleculeComputer scienceBiochemistryBiologyMaterials scienceNucleotideOrganic chemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guanine plays an indispensable role in building nucleic acids, and its derivatives take part in various cellular functions such as regulating biological reactions and signal transduction. Monitoring the levels of guanine and its derivatives is critical for understanding their biological roles and related diseases. Aside from traditional chromatography-based methods, majority of the current detections were based on electrochemistry and the oxidation activity of guanine, for which guanine and adenine often had a similar response. Over the last 30 years, various new sensing strategies have been developed. To provide researchers with more options for specific sensing of guanine and its derivatives, herein we review molecular recognition strategies based on nucleic acids, proteins, small organic molecules, molecularly imprinted polymers to nanomaterials. The mechanism of each molecular recognition strategy is discussed. Based on these target recognition molecules, we also critically review representative fluorescent and electrochemical sensors for guanine-related analytes from an application point of view, and provide readers with our perspectives to further grow this direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensors and Actuators ReportsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207