MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Estimating the depth of the restrictive layer of soil in a cranberry field based on CT scan images

2020· article· en· W3090851491 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elnaz Shahriarinia, Silvio José Gumière, Christian Dupuis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigationSoil waterChemistryAnimal scienceSoil scienceAgronomyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimating the depth of the restrictive layer of soil in a cranberry field based on CT scan images Cranberry production is a dominant culture in Québec, Canada. In cranberry production, there is a substantial need for water whether for irrigation, harvesting, or frost control. Some farms are implementing subirrigation procedures in order to reduce water use and increase fruit yields. However, this irrigation method may impose hydraulic stresses on soil particles which results in the movement of fine particles. The accumulation of the soil particles in narrow pore throats leads to the formation of restrictive layers in soil. In this respect, we are going to study the changes in soil media and its porosity based on X-ray computed tomography (CT) which is a non-destructive imaging method. Consequently, X-ray CT has become a great asset to analyze soil physical properties. With the analysis of the images captured by the use of X-ray computed tomography, it is possible to visualize and analyze the pore network structure in the soil media. This study reports the results of subirrigation experiments for four different sandy soils. These column experiments aimed to reproduce the effects of subirrigation in cranberry fields for 40 years. Seven different time steps were taken with a medical CT scanner SOMATOM Definition AS+ 128 (Siemens, Germany). The 2-D horizontal 16-bit gray-scale images were captured by an X-ray energy level of 140 KeV. For each column, we got 1677 images of 512 512 pixels with a voxel size of 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.6 mm (x, y, z). Studying our images for further analysis, we used several global and local methods to find the most reliable and efficient one to binarize our images. Results show that the methods and the image analysis neighborhood have a great impact on the accuracy of the image segmentation. We were able to reconstruct a 3-D visualization of the soil pore network for each column. We used this reconstruction to demonstrate that the variation of porosity and soil pore characteristics can be studied over time. We find that the transport of soil particles tends to be highest when there are fine sandy soil particles on top of a layer of coarse soil. These finer particles have sufficient energy to be remobilized within the pore network while coarser particles remain in place. Our results show that soil particle transport can be assessed using time-lapse imagery and thus makes it possible to approximate the depth and amount of time that will be required for these restrictive layers to form in different soil profiles. Finally, it would be possible to find the best structure of soil in construction of a cranberry field in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207