Pembuatan Video Promosi Perpustakaan di Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, it is discussed about Making Library Promotion Videos in Imam Bonjol State Islamic University Library Padang. The purpose of this paper is to describe the stages of making library promotional videos at the Imam Bonjol State Islamic University Library in Padang. This type of research is qualitative with descriptive method. Data collected through observation and interviews with the Head of Imam Bonjol State Islamic University Library Padang. Based on analyzing the data it can be concluded that the steps in making a library promotion video are follows: First, preproduction is the initial stage before the video production process consists of the discovery of ideas which are the theme of production, synopsis, treatment which gives an overview of the production theme, storyboards that describe a series of events, shooting scripts as a guide in the field, production planning, and production preparation. Second, production to realize all the steps in the preproduction stage. Third, post-production is the final stage in video production before it’s ready to be presented.Keywords: videos, promotions, libraries
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".