Pengolahan Sampah Rumah Tangga Menjadi Kompos di Kelurahan Tuah Madani Kecamatan Tampan Kota Pekanbaru
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tuah Madani Subdistrict Tampan District already has a Waste Bank, but to process organic waste into compost, the Garbage Bank cadres in each RW still do not have this knowledge. The Unilak Community Service Team has the required knowledge, and through this activity a transfer of knowledge is carried out, so that the Garbage Bank Cadres will more optimally manage the waste that has been collected in the Waste Banks of each RW. The method of activities that will be given to the community is, awareness, counseling, demonstration, and evaluation. Awareness is intended to give awareness to the Garbage Bank Cadre that managing waste into compost will have a positive impact on the environment. Counseling aims to provide knowledge to the community so that they are more sensitive to their environment, so that the environment will provide results that benefit their families. Demonstration aims to provide knowledge directly, both through picture shows, and direct practice making compost from household waste. And an evaluation is carried out to determine the level of knowledge of partners before and after the activity, and to find out the success of the activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it