MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091031378 · doi:10.1093/heapro/daaa108

Deconstructing hegemonic epistemologies: an urgent call for anti-racist scholarship for health promotion and Black lives

2020· article· en· W3091031378 on OpenAlexaff
J. Hope Corbin, Oliver Mweemba, Fungisai Gwanzura Ottemöller, Ann Pederson, Stephanie Leitch, Nikita Boston-Fisher, Tulani Francis L. Matenga, Peter Delobelle, Christa Ayele, Josette Wicker

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Promotion International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipHegemonyPromotion (chess)Gender studiesHealth promotionSociologyPolitical sciencePublic healthMedicineNursingPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The year 2020, with its global pandemic, economic hardship, social isolation and violence has brought profound suffering, overdue learning and important opportunities. One such opportunity is the chance for the field of health promotion to unflinchingly commit to building and sustaining efforts to address the inequities so vividly illuminated by the COVID-19 pandemic—specifically, inequities experienced by Black communities. COVID-19 is taking a disproportionate toll on Black communities the world over. Cities, countries and regions tracking such data are reporting drastically higher rates of infection, complications and deaths. Black people’s experiences of higher prevalence and more severe outcomes due to COVID-19 are not unlike the overrepresentation, earlier onset and increased mortality rates experienced by Black people for a plethora of conditions (including diabetes, hypertension, HIV/AIDS and respiratory diseases). These health inequities are not new and, indeed, reflect patterns of social, economic and political oppression that represent a continuing legacy from slavery and colonialism to the present day, impacting Africans, the African diaspora and their descendants in diverse global contexts. This pre-existing inequity is merely exacerbated in the face of the pandemic (for a much more detailed treatment of the impact of COVID-19 on the Black community, see Leitch et al., Forthcoming). In addition to the horrors wreaked by COVID-19, Black communities worldwide have also confronted new examples of police brutality—the murder of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police and then the subsequent police violence that ensued in response to protests (Amnesty International, 2020). These US events prompted a swelling of other protests and social unrest (and police retaliation) worldwide. Institutionalized violence toward Black people (it is also important to acknowledge the intersectional experience of oppression and how people who hold various gender, economic, able-bodied and other identities are multiplicatively impacted along these axes (Crenshaw, 1991)), like health inequity, is not a new phenomenon—indeed, these two are connected through a centuries-long historical legacy of slavery and colonialism. While many groups are marginalized and experience institutional violence (e.g. Indigenous peoples, LGBTQ+ communities and religious minorities), Black people experience a unique form of anti-Black racism and have been impacted by complex systems of intergenerational economic deprivation and social control. In the USA, for example, policies criminalizing Black people from slave patrols to Jim Crow to contemporary drug laws and mass incarceration continue in an unbroken timeline (Alexander, 2010). What is new, however, is the sustained attention Black Lives Matter uprisings are commanding, especially of groups and institutions that have historically turned a blind eye. At the time of this writing in late August, Black Lives Matter protests have been ongoing in thousands of locations for over 3 months. The New York Times reported back in early July, that at that time, it was believed to be the largest social movement in US history (Buchanan et al., 2020). The current protests are also unique in the racial makeup of the protesters. The presence of large numbers of white protesters is indicative of a blossoming recognition that self-reflection and accountability is vital for social change. This current moment challenges the field of health promotion to (re)commit itself to being on the frontlines of this fight. Through the upsurge of resources, action, and leadership of Black people, we can harness our scholarly efforts to find synergies for making a real difference in reducing the inequities experienced by Black people globally. Health Promotion International, as the thought journal of the international health promotion movement, seeks ‘theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field… the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development’. There are many areas of health promotion scholarship that we could apply to more adequately redress the inequities faced in Black communities, and even more areas we can develop. As a field, we have worked consistently over 34 years to advance our understanding of and effectiveness in addressing inequity more broadly. But what existing theories, approaches and strategies can support the social change that Black communities have been articulating in response to racist hegemony? How can we use our privilege to meaningfully contribute to the health promotion antiracist canon to guide and shape the efforts of those working in the trenches? How can we apply theoretical frames such as Salutogenesis to better understand the intergenerational resilience of Black communities? What can we learn about successful organizing techniques and the mass mobilization of community members? How can we elevate and amplify the voices of Black scholars and leaders in our field? We have a lot to learn about how our field can do better. For example, how are we complicit in reproducing the inequities experienced by Black communities in our methods and practices? How can we infuse our work with anti-racist sensibilities? We desperately need research on addressing anti-Black racism across sectors—education, employment, government, health, the media, industry, religious institutions, environmental agencies and community networks—and how doing so can impact health outcomes. We need critical theoretical frames which help health promoters reflect on the importance of decentering whiteness, the need to commit to Indigenous knowledge systems and ways of working that promote multiple epistemologies and liberating pedagogies. We also need to foster environments and create opportunities for nurturing Black students and health promoters in our institutions as we think of building and mentoring the future cadre of our profession. Their presence is critical for this work. Fighting pandemics, human rights violations and promoting health equity and social justice are anti-racist projects that are fundamentally aligned with the core tenets of health promotion. Health Promotion International is committed to supporting justice movements with quality scholarship, so please submit yours today!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.115
Scholarly communication0.0200.027
Open science0.0030.014
Research integrity0.0090.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.276
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHealth Promotion InternationalSame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207