MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091046546 · doi:10.1190/geo2019-0638.1

Transform-domain noise synthesis and normal moveout-stack deconvolution approach to ground roll attenuation

2020· article· en· W3091046546 on OpenAlexaff
Felix Oghenekohwo, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)DeconvolutionAcousticsAttenuationAmplitudeSIGNAL (programming language)AlgorithmFourier transformNormal moveoutComputer scienceSynthetic dataGeologyFrequency domainGradient noiseNoise floorNoise measurementMathematicsOpticsMathematical analysisPhysicsNoise reductionArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Ground roll is coherent noise in land seismic data that contaminates seismic reflections. Therefore, it is essential to find efficient ways that remove this noise and still preserve reflections. To this end, we have developed a signal and noise separation framework that uses a hyperbolic moveout assumption on reflections, coupled with the synthesis of coherent ground roll. This framework yields a least-squares problem, which we solve using a sparsity-promoting program that gives coefficients capable of modeling the signal and noise. Subtraction of the predicted noise from the observed data produces data with amplitude-preserved reflections. We develop this technique on synthetic and field data contaminated by weak and strong ground roll noise. Compared to conventional Fourier filtering techniques, our method accurately removes the ground roll while preserving the amplitude of the signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207