MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3091095197 · doi:10.1190/segam2020-3427559.1

From a regional AVA screening to focused elastic attributes estimation: An integrated solution from seismic acquisition to reservoir characterization

2020· article· en· W3091095197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Reiser, E. Polyaeva, Scott Opdyke

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimationReservoir modelingGeologyCharacterization (materials science)SeismologyComputer scienceRemote sensingPetroleum engineeringSystems engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the elastic properties of reservoirs in exploration can be very challenging – due mainly to the lack of well information, limited regional geological understanding, and the quality and reliability of seismic data available. This case study illustrates how this challenge can be addressed through an integrated solution from broadband seismic acquisition to elastic properties, applied recently to the underexplored deep-water Orphan Basin, offshore Eastern Canada. A multisensor seismic dataset covering close to 22,500 km2 was acquired over three seasons (from 2017 to 2019) and now constitutes a great platform for understanding the geology as well as extracting elastic properties. The understanding of the prospectivity was performed at the regional scale, then on more localized area using one of the very few wells present in the area. On this localized area the newest depth imaging technologies with Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) and Least-Squares Migration (LSM) were used. In addition, a three term Amplitude Versus Angle (AVA) inversion was performed and matched at the well without using the well actively in the process but by using the broadband seismic data only: velocity and amplitude. Turnaround time was also a key element in this regional project. To significantly reduce this, an integrated team of imaging and quantitative interpretation specialists was dedicated to the project from the start. Pre-stack AVO QC was performed iteratively during the processing to ensure that the final pre-stack data was fit for purpose and AVO/AVA compliant for further Quantitative Interpretation (QI) analysis. Presentation Date: Monday, October 12, 2020 Session Start Time: 1:50 PM Presentation Time: 2:15 PM Location: 361A Presentation Type: Oral

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→